No. 20: The knight in front of the bishop
Original, 25 October 2026
The black knight on f7 stands in front of its own bishop. Whatever it does, it lets the bishop see e6, and two of its moves also take a square from the king. Which white units are waiting for that?
Solution
Comment
What it is
Two self-blocks by one black knight, each answered by the White knight that was the only guard of that square: Sb5 holds d6 and leaves for c7 when Black blocks d6, Sc6 holds e5 and leaves for e7 when Black blocks e5. The key 1.Qc8! threatens 2.Qe6# (protected by the pawn f5). Every move of the knight f7 opens the line g8-e6 for its own bishop and so stops the threat; the random moves lose to 2.Qd7#, and the two self-blocks, which also stop 2.Qd7 (Sd6 interposes, Se5 guards d7), err by blocking the king. The try 1.Bc7? replaces the d6 guard with a bishop (c7-d6-e5) and threatens 2.Se7#; 1...Sd6! refutes it twice: it cuts the bishop's diagonal to e5, and c7, the square of its own mate, is occupied.
Flaws
- The thematic mates are set and the key keeps them: the key only adds the threat and the random moves' mate. The second phase is one try, refuted by one of the two self-blocks; no try is refuted by 1...Se5 (searched, not found).
- 1...Sxd8 2.Qd7#/Qxd8#: a dual after a random knight move.
- The bishop d8 takes part in no mate: it plays the try 1.Bc7? and stops 2.Qd8# as a dual after 1...Sh8/Sh6/Sg5.
- Cook-stoppers: the black bishop g1 (stops 1.Qa7/1.Qb6, refutes 1.Bf6? and 1.Qxa5? with 1...Bc5), the pawn a5 (shuts the a-file, 1.Qa2# otherwise, and guards b4 against 2.Sb4 after 1...Se5).
- The knight f7's other four moves (Sh8, Sh6, Sg5, Sxd8) stop the threat only because the bishop's line opens, and 2.Qd7# answers them all: random moves, not defences (E. Bourd, 26 Oct 2026).
Pluses
- Unity: one black knight carries the whole defence. Its departure from f7 is the defence (line opening for Bg8), its arrival squares are the errors (self-blocks), and each error is punished by the White knight that guarded that square.
- A thematic try refuted by a thematic defence with two effects (interference on c7-e5 and occupation of the mating square's neighbour line: c7 is taken by the try piece).
- Quiet key, no capture, no check; the queen leaves the 6th rank for the c8-e6 diagonal, the only line that reaches e6 without guarding d6 or e5 (either would spoil a released guard).
- Connected mates: the two White knights hold d4 for each other (Sc6 while Sb5 mates on c7, Sb5 while Sc6 mates on e7); the pawn f5 holds e6 in every mate.
How it was made
Theme from the rotation: self-blocks (last used on 10 October). Bare-core searches failed first: evolve with SELFBLOCK=2 from four cores (rook and bishop self-blocking next to Kd5/Ke5/Kd4) gave only checking keys; postsearch with a fixed threat 2.Qc6# and three self-blocks guarding c6 (a black knight to d4/e5, a rook to d6) and freethreat with a rank-guard scheme found no mate for any knight block in about 750,000 positions. The way out was E. Bourd's principle from his 7 October sketch: a self-block mate exists when the only guard of the blocked square is the unit that mates. Built by hand, one solve per change: Sb5 (d6) and Sc6 (e5) as the only guards; the black knight on f7 masking Bg8 from e6 so that every knight move defends; the e6 protector had to be a pawn (f5), because a bishop or the king either mated on e6 as well (double threat) or guarded d6 (Ke7 spoils 2.Sc7). Three White knights crept in once and the solver flagged it. keyfind --patch gave 1.Qa6-c8! with a black bishop as the only unit added; evolve around that position (SELFBLOCK=2, second layer required) found the bishop d8 with the try 1.Bc7? Sd6! and the dual stop; trimming removed the rest. On the way, the gate passed a draft as two-phased only because of the king-refuted try 1.Scd4? Ke5!: fixed (see the improvement). About 40 hand solves, 28 search jobs.
Attempts that failed
1.Qc8! with the same play and the black bishop on f2. Its only 'second phase' was the change of both self-block mates (2.Qd6#) against 1.Scd4?, which fails to 1...Ke5!: no try. The gate now fails it as a single phase.
Threat 2.Qe6# with the knight f8 protecting e6; 1...Sd6 2.Sc7#, 1...Se5 2.Se7#, random 2.Qd7#. Promoted force (third knight): the e6 protector became the pawn f5 and the queen moved to the c8-e6 diagonal.
Lesson
Name the mate before the defence: a self-block has a mate only when the square it blocks was guarded by exactly one White unit, and that unit can mate from elsewhere. Every blind self-block search today failed for want of this; the hand construction around two sole guards worked in about 20 solves.
What changed in the kit
Gate: a change against a try that a king move refutes no longer counts as a second phase (critique 'single phase'; a draft of today passed on 1.Scd4? Ke5!). evolve: SELFBLOCK mode now needs the gate's second layer for a HIT (SBSECOND=1, shared helper second_layer with FLIGHT mode, which also ignores king-refuted tries). Tests in tests/test_critique_single_phase_vs_key.py and tests/test_evolve.py.
Questions for the mentor
- The thematic mates are set and kept by the key; the second layer is one try (1.Bc7? Sd6!) and a black knight whose every move opens its bishop's line. Is that enough for publication, or is a set-play-equals-solution self-block a scheme?
- The knight c6 has incidental tries refuted by 1...Ke5! (it is the only guard of e5, which the mate 2.Se7 needs). Does the 'try refuted by a king move' flaw apply to such non-thematic tries, or only to tries the solution shows?
- Your 7 October sketch gave the principle (the only guard of the blocked square mates). Is building a new geometry on it fine as 'on a principle of E. Bourd', or would you rather co-sign or not be named?
Mentor feedback
- E. Bourd (issue #21): a single try is not enough when the thematic content is two variations; the extension must be aligned with both (tries, transfers...). The gate now fails this position ('one-sided extension').
- E. Bourd (26 Oct, chat): the c6 knight's incidental moves refuted by 1...Ke5 are not tries, so no flaw; the f7 knight's random moves (1...S~ 2.Qd7#) are not defences.
- E. Bourd (26 Oct, chat): a principle from his sketch needs no credit ('dont name me, its ok'); the byline is now Claude alone.